Whiteboarding tools range from $0-$1,200+/year per team. Compare Miro, Mural, and FigJam across pricing, features, and team size. Find the best fit for remote collaboration, design thinking, and product ideation—and save $20K-$60K/year.
The Question: Your team needs a digital whiteboarding tool for remote brainstorming, design sprints, and product mapping. Miro, Mural, and FigJam all work—but which one offers the best value?
The Answer: It depends on your team size, use case, and existing tool ecosystem. Miro offers unlimited boards at lower cost. Mural is best for facilitation-heavy teams. FigJam (part of Figma) is cheapest if you're already on Figma.
| Tool | Annual Cost | Per-Board Model | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| FigJam (Figma add-on) | $12–$60/month | Unlimited (part of Figma) | Design teams already using Figma |
| Miro | $480–$1,200/year | Unlimited boards (team plan) | Large teams, agile teams, unlimited brainstorming |
| Mural | $600–$1,500/year | Unlimited boards (team plan) | Facilitation-heavy teams, design sprints, larger organizations |
Cost: FREE with Figma Standard ($12/mo) or Professional ($30/mo). Standalone: $12–60/month (part of Figma suite).
What You Get:
Strengths:
Weaknesses: Limited templates compared to Miro/Mural (fewer enterprise/facilitation templates), no built-in voting/polling (unlike Miro), cannot embed external content as easily.
Best For: Design teams, product teams already using Figma, organizations wanting to consolidate design + whiteboarding into one tool.
Cost: Free tier (3 boards, read-only guests), $40–80/month (Team plan, unlimited boards), $150–300/month (Business plan, unlimited everything).
What You Get:
Strengths:
Weaknesses: Less designed for enterprise facilitation (Mural stronger), fewer advanced meeting controls, smaller user base in enterprise/Fortune 500 context.
Best For: Agile teams, product teams, engineering teams doing brainstorming + planning, organizations wanting unlimited boards on a budget.
Cost: Free tier (limited), $50–125/month (Team plan), $250–500/month (Enterprise).
What You Get:
Strengths:
Weaknesses: Most expensive option ($50–125/mo vs Miro $40–80), smaller template library than Miro, less robust Jira integration.
Best For: Enterprise organizations, consulting/facilitation firms, teams running structured workshops/design sprints, organizations with compliance requirements (HIPAA).
| Feature | FigJam | Miro | Mural |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlimited Boards | ✅ Yes | ✅ Team plan+ | ✅ All plans |
| Unlimited Team Members | ✅ Enterprise only | ⚠️ Per-seat licensing | ⚠️ Per-seat licensing |
| Templates Available | ⚠️ ~50 | ✅ 600+ | ✅ 300+ |
| Voting/Prioritization | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (dot voting, ranking) | ✅ Yes (advanced voting) |
| Facilitator Mode | ⚠️ Basic | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Advanced (lock boards, control room) |
| Video Conferencing | ⚠️ Via integrations | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in |
| Jira Integration | ❌ No | ✅ Excellent | ⚠️ Good |
| Design Tool Integration | ✅ Native (Figma) | ⚠️ Via screenshot | ⚠️ Via screenshot |
| Enterprise Security (HIPAA/SOC2) | ❌ No | ✅ Enterprise tier | ✅ Enterprise tier |
| Cheapest Entry Price | ✅ $0 (with Figma) | ✅ $40/mo | ⚠️ $50/mo |
FigJam: If already on Figma Professional ($30/mo) = $0 incremental. Total: $1,800/year (Figma subscription). If standalone: $60–180/year.
Miro: Free tier (3 boards) sufficient, or Team plan $40/mo = $480/year.
Mural: Free tier or $50/mo = $600/year.
Winner: FigJam (if already on Figma), otherwise Miro.
FigJam: Figma team plan ($30/person/mo) = $7,200/year for 20 people + FigJam free.
Miro: Team plan $60/mo = $720/year (covers all 20 people).
Mural: Team plan $80/mo = $960/year.
Winner: Miro (whiteboarding only cost is lowest). If you need Figma too, FigJam + Figma might be justified for design-heavy teams.
FigJam: Enterprise pricing (contact sales). Likely $50–200+/mo depending on team size.
Miro: Business plan $150–300/mo (unlimited everything) = $1,800–3,600/year.
Mural: Enterprise plan $250–500+/mo = $3,000–6,000+/year.
Winner: Miro (Business plan at $3,600/year is cheapest for unlimited teams).
FigJam: Enterprise tier (unknown pricing, likely $500+/mo).
Miro: Enterprise plan + HIPAA/SOC2 add-on (contact sales), likely $3,000–5,000+/year.
Mural: Enterprise plan with HIPAA/SOC2 (built-in) = $3,000–6,000+/year.
Winner: Miral or Miro (depends on negotiation). Mural more mature in enterprise context.
Situation: Team of designers, product managers, and engineers. Already paying for Figma Professional ($30/person/month = $10,800/year). Needed whiteboarding tool.
Option A (Separate Tool): Keep Figma + add Miro Team plan ($60/mo = $720/year). Total: $11,520/year.
Option B (FigJam): Keep Figma Professional + use FigJam (free). Total: $10,800/year.
Savings: $720/year by choosing FigJam + faster workflow (design → prototype → whiteboard in one app).
Situation: Multiple engineering teams doing daily standups, sprint planning, backlog refinement. Scrum masters wanted to consolidate whiteboarding tool.
Option A (Miro): Team plan $80/mo = $960/year (all 60 people). Integration with Jira automatic.
Option B (Mural): Team plan $100/mo = $1,200/year. Less Jira integration, higher setup friction.
Option C (FigJam): Not suitable (no Agile templates, Jira integration weak).
Savings: $240/year by choosing Miro vs Mural + better Jira integration + 600+ Agile templates.
Situation: Consulting firm runs 20–30 design sprints/year for clients. Needed enterprise-grade facilitator controls + client data isolation.
Option A (Mural Enterprise): $300/mo = $3,600/year. HIPAA/SOC2 compliance built-in. Dedicated customer success.
Option B (Miro Business): $200/mo = $2,400/year. No HIPAA/SOC2 (would require add-on).
Option C (FigJam Enterprise): Unknown pricing, likely $3,000–5,000+/year with uncertain compliance roadmap.
Savings: $1,200/year by choosing Miro if compliance not needed. If compliance required, Mural is justified ($3,600/year).
Yes, though it creates friction. Teams often migrate from one tool to another rather than maintaining multiple whiteboarding solutions. Pick one and commit to it for 6 months.
All three are similarly fast (under 100ms latency). Miro and Mural have slight performance advantages for large boards (100+ people). FigJam's performance is excellent but canvas size is slightly more limited.
Yes. All three support embedding via iframe or API. Miro and Mural both offer embeddable boards for public dashboards.
Switching is painful because whiteboards are semi-ephemeral (most value is in the ideation process, not the final artifact). Plan for: (1) Export existing boards as images/PDFs, (2) Migrate key templates manually, (3) Train team on new tool (2–4 weeks). Avoid switching mid-quarter.
Miro and Mural are cloud-only. FigJam is cloud-only (no self-hosted option). If you need self-hosted, consider open-source alternatives like Excalidraw (free, self-hosted) or Tldraw (MIT licensed).
All three support mobile (iOS + Android) but whiteboarding is much easier on a desktop. Mural has the most mature mobile app (better for facilitators controlling sessions from iPad). FigJam mobile experience is weakest.
Get a free team size calculator + tool recommendation engine to find the best whiteboarding tool for your specific use case.
Free. No credit card required. Results delivered in 24 hours.
Monitor Miro, Mural, FigJam, and 85+ other tools for price changes. Get the $19 Lifetime Deal + access price tracking for all whiteboarding and collaboration tools.
Claim $19 Deal Now